Not long ago, President George W. Bush said:

โ€œOur enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.โ€ (May 8, 2004)

Read literally, this statement sounds as if Bush were saying: โ€œI will find new ways to harm the American people.โ€ Of course, that sounds wrong and inappropriate, but thatโ€™s what he actually said.

A Comparison of Bush and Kerry Rhetoric

In the 2004 campaign, Bush and Cheney displayed a similar rhetorical patternโ€”twisting the opponent’s words to strengthen their own positions. Dana Milbank of the Washington Post noted several examples:

Sample Statements by John Kerry

  • โ€œMy goal is troop reduction, and I believe that if diplomacy and alliance-building are done right, that is a worthy goal and one I will achieve.โ€ (August 9, 2004)
  • โ€œI will fight terrorism with a more effective, more strategic, more proactive, and more sensitive strategy, while working with other nations to strengthen alliances.โ€ (August 5, 2004)
  • โ€œThis administration has not done the necessary work to reach out to other nations and protect our facilities, as the 9/11 commission recommended.โ€ (August 2, 2004)
  • โ€œI will use the appropriate authority to intervene in Iraq, but I differ from President Bush. The question is: why is he rushing into war without a plan to win the peace?โ€ (August 9, 2004)

Sample Statements by Bush & Cheney

  • โ€œKerry was wrong to say troops would be drastically reduced within six months. That sends mixed signals to the enemy.โ€ (August 18, 2004)
  • Cheney: โ€œThose who threaten us and kill civilians donโ€™t need to be treated more sensitively. They must be destroyed.โ€ (August 12, 2004)
  • Bush: โ€œNow Kerry agrees that the decision to enter Iraq was correct, even though weapons of mass destruction had not been found.โ€ (August 18, 2004)

Moral Questions for the President

We want a President who is honest and understands the situation, not one who confuses the public. If Bush truly doesn’t understand, that’s bad for a presidency. However, if he understands but continues to twist the facts, that’s even worse, because it means he’s being petty and manipulative for his own gain.

Conservatives who want to uphold conservative principles should carefully evaluate the President’s actions and consider whether they want to support such behavior.

Argumentation and Credibility

If Kerry’s statement was deemed offensive, Bush should have responded with arguments and facts, instead of twisting words, creating a “straw man,” and then laughing it off. Transparency, honesty, and integrity remain important standards for any leader.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *